By Anson Antony S

Introduction

The UEFA Europa League match between Tottenham Hotspur and AZ Alkmaar on October 24, 2024, showcased contrasting tactical approaches from both teams. Tottenham, under the management of Ange Postecoglou, continued to implement an aggressive and dynamic style, while AZ Alkmaar, led by Maarten Martens, struggled to assert themselves against a well-organized Spurs side.

Formation and Lineups

Tactical Approach

Tottenham Hotspur

  1. High Pressing Game: Tottenham employed a high pressing strategy that aimed to disrupt AZ's build-up play from the back. This tactic forced errors from the opposition and allowed Spurs to regain possession quickly. The pressing was particularly effective in the first half when Spurs dominated possession (57%) but struggled to convert this into clear chances.
  2. Fluid Attacking Play: The attacking trio of Richarlison, Timo Werner, and Dominic Solanke displayed fluid movement across the front line. They frequently interchanged positions to create mismatches against AZ's defense. Richarlison's movement was crucial in drawing defenders out of position, which opened up space for others.
  3. Utilization of Width: Spurs utilized the width of the pitch effectively through their full-backs and wingers. Pedro Porro and Ashley Gray provided overlapping runs that stretched AZ’s defensive line. This width allowed for more crossing opportunities into the box.
  4. Set-Piece Threats: Tottenham looked dangerous during set pieces, particularly corners and free-kicks. Their height advantage in the box was evident, although they failed to capitalize on several opportunities.

AZ Alkmaar

  1. Defensive Solidity: AZ's primary focus was on maintaining a solid defensive structure with two holding midfielders (Clasie and Mijnans) shielding the back four. However, they struggled to cope with Tottenham's pace and creativity in attack.
  2. Counter-Attacking Strategy: While AZ aimed to absorb pressure and hit Spurs on the counter-attack, their execution was lacking. The midfielders often found themselves outnumbered when transitioning from defense to attack, limiting their effectiveness.
  3. Limited Offensive Threats: AZ struggled to create clear-cut chances throughout the match. Their best opportunities came sporadically through individual efforts rather than cohesive team play. The absence of a consistent threat from their forwards meant they were largely contained by Tottenham's defense.
  4. Impact of Red Card: The sending off of David Moller Wolfe in the 85th minute further hampered AZ’s chances of mounting a comeback. Playing with ten men restricted their ability to press for an equalizer and forced them into a more defensive posture.

Key Moments